Warning: Spoilers for Reacher Season 1 and 2
The highly anticipated second season of Amazon Prime’s Reacher series has finally arrived, and fans of the show are still reeling from the twists and turns. However, a closer examination of the new season reveals a significant contradiction with the events of the first season, specifically the backstory of the titular character, Jack Reacher.
For those who may not be familiar, the Reacher series is based on the popular novel series by Lee Child. The show follows the adventures of Jack Reacher, a former Major in the United States Army Military Police Corps, as he travels the country and becomes embroiled in various mysteries and crimes.
In the first season, the show established that Reacher had left the military after 13 years of service, citing a desire to "start over" and leave his past behind. The season finale even hinted at a traumatic event in Reacher’s past, which had led to his decision to leave the military.
However, the second season of Reacher takes a drastic departure from this established backstory. In the new season, it is revealed that Reacher was actually forced to leave the military after a scandal involving a high-ranking officer, which led to his honorable discharge. This new information directly contradicts the events of the first season, where Reacher left the military of his own accord.
This contradiction raises several questions. Why did the show’s writers choose to change Reacher’s backstory so drastically? Did they simply forget about the events of the first season, or was there a deliberate attempt to retcon (retroactively change) the character’s history?
Fans of the show are left scratching their heads, trying to make sense of this sudden change. Some have taken to social media to express their disappointment and confusion, while others have speculated about the motivations behind the change.
One possible explanation is that the show’s writers wanted to introduce a new layer of complexity to Reacher’s character. By changing his backstory, they may have been attempting to add depth and nuance to his personality, making him a more relatable and human character.
However, this change also raises questions about the show’s commitment to continuity. If the writers are willing to contradict established events from the first season, what other changes might they make in future seasons? Will they continue to alter Reacher’s backstory, or will they stick to the original narrative?
Ultimately, the decision to contradict the events of the first season is a bold one, and only time will tell if it pays off for the show. Fans of Reacher will have to wait and see how the rest of the season unfolds, and whether the show can recover from this significant departure from its established narrative.
In the meantime, it’s clear that the Reacher series has sparked a lively debate among fans about the importance of continuity in storytelling. As the show continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how the writers navigate the delicate balance between creative freedom and fan expectations.